Tag: Gulf of Mexico

A Look at the Keystone XL Pipeline

Past
In 2008, TransCanada Corporation proposed a plan for the longest pipeline in North America, the Keystone XL Pipeline. With a starting point in Alberta’s Oil Sands, the Keystone XL Pipeline would carry the tar-sands crude through the Great Plains to the Gulf of Mexico, bringing an additional 830,000 barrels of oil per day to U.S. refineries.

The pipeline requires approval in two parts: upper and lower. While the upper portion of the pipeline requires U.S. State Department approval since the pipeline crosses an international border, the lower portion will need federal permits for approval. The approval process has been complicated, with environmental, safety and time concerns restricting the project.

Present
In January, President Barack Obama rejected the project, advising the decision was “not based on [the] merits of the pipeline,” but having a short deadline to make a decision on the project. He also cited the need to find a route that would avoid the Nebraska Sandhills region and Ogallala Aquifer, which provides water to eight U. S. states.

TransCanada has been working with the State of Nebraska since November 2011 to find alternate routes that will avoid the environmentally sensitive Ogallala Aquifer and Sandhills, stating it will be reapplying for permission to build the pipeline from Canada to Oklahoma using this alternate route.

Advocates in favor of the Keystone XL Pipeline, argue it will employ thousands of workers, deliver more oil to U.S. refineries in the Gulf of Mexico, reduce U.S. reliance on oil from the Persian Gulf and increase the amount of oil imported from Canada.

Future
While TransCanada pursues a new permit, it will proceed with building the southern portion of the pipeline, from Cushing, Oklahoma to the Gulf of Mexico. This portion is located entirely within the U.S. and therefore does not require U.S. State Department approval.

This 435-mile section of the pipeline is expected to produce several benefits including:

  • Moving 700,000+ barrels of oil per day
  • Generating approximately 4,000 jobs
  • Reducing the large surplus of oil stored in Cushing, OK

With the decision to begin expansion in the south, it is expected pipeline construction will continue on at a steady pace, even during the reapplication process and while alternate route decisions are being made.

If the Keystone XL Pipeline moves forward as expected, U.S. crude imports from Canada could reach 4 million barrels per day by 2020, doubling what we currently import from the Persian Gulf.

http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-01-18/obama-rejects-keystone-pipeline/52655762/1
http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2012/03/04/keystone-pipeline-moving-forward/
http://www.isnetworld.com/~isn/blog/2011/12/09/the-current-status-of-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-lobbying-against-keystone-pipeline-201208007.html
http://facefwd.com/tag/oil-surplus
http://www.api.org/policy-and-issues/policy-items/keystone-xl/keystone-xl-pipeline.aspx

2011 ISN Annual Users Conference: Navigating Through BOEMRE Regulatory Waters

At the ISN Annual Users Conference, Doug Slitor, Acting Chief of the Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs, is presenting the new regulations and best practices for offshore operators and contractors as previously set forth by BOEMRE. BOEMRE, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, was reorganized on October 1 into two separate entities: the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE). Mr. Slitor explains the function and scope of these new bureaus’ work.

Originally created from the former Minerals Management Service, BOEMRE’s intention has been to make the Gulf of Mexico safe for workers and the environment alike. Now as two distinct organizations, BOEM and BSEE play specific roles.

BOEM focuses on resource identification, leasing, and compliance with environmental regulations. BSEE takes on the job of regulatory development, inspection, technical research, and enforcement of safety regulations.  Another important component of BSEE’s work is oil spill response oversight, a function whose value was magnified after the Deepwater Horizon spill in April 2010.

As part of its effort to encourage and regulate safe practices in the Gulf of Mexico, BSEE has created SEMS, Safety and Environmental Management Systems. It is mandatory for offshore operators to have a SEMS plan in place by November 15, 2011.

Mr. Slitor also outlines SEMS expectations in his presentation. Elements of an approved SEMS plan include: Hazard Analysis, Emergency Response and Control, and a Contractor/Operator interface. Operators must also provide records of their contractors’ knowledge and training for the job they perform. ISN has partnered with its Owner Clients to use the Training Qualification (TQ) tool in ISNetworld in order to meet this requirement.

ISN assists contractors in meeting TQ requirements set forth by their Owner Client by providing a comprehensive activity list, templates to organize and upload employee information, and step-by-step written instructions on how to meet SEMS requirements in ISNetworld.

http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/13/farewell-to-an-acronym/?scp=1&sq=bsee&st=cse
http://www.boemre.gov/
http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/04/22/22greenwire-debate-on-protecting-oil-rig-workers-takes-a-n-82148.html?scp=1&sq=SEMS%20boemre&st=cse

SEMS: A New Standard for Offshore Operations

Time is running short for offshore energy operators.

April 15th gives industry operators only seven more months to plan and implement Safety & Environmental Management Systems (SEMS,) an approach made mandatory by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) last November.

Previously voluntary, the BOEMRE’s now-mandatory compliance deadline is November 15, 2011. This regulatory push by the BOEMRE, the federal agency responsible for overseeing the safe and environmentally responsible development of energy and mineral resources on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS,) has even greater support in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico, which poured more than four million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

According to BOEMRE, the SEMS is a nontraditional, performance-focused tool for integrating and managing offshore operations. The approach is composed of 13 elements and was created to enhance the safety and cleanliness of operations by reducing the frequency and severity of accidents. Applicable to all OCS oil and gas operations under the BOEMRE jurisdiction, affected industries include: drilling, production, construction, well workover, well completion, well servicing and DOI pipeline.

The BOEMRE has four chief SEMS objectives:

  1. Focus attention on the influences that human error and poor organization have on accidents
  2. Continuous improvement in the offshore industry’s safety and environmental records
  3. Encourage the use of performance-based operating practices
  4. Collaborate with industry in efforts that promote the public interests of offshore worker safety and environmental protection.

With the Deepwater Horizon disaster still top of mind, the complexity and risk of offshore operations continue to draw attention to the need for strengthened safety audits and has furthered the importance of the SEMS initiative. Regulators are adamant and have set strict consequences for compliance, including the possibility of facilities being closed if the program implementation deadline is not met.

In a March 15 workshop, the BOEMRE provided an overview and background on SEMS, addressed frequently asked questions and reviewed the process for SEMS audits and reviews. Suggestions for creating a SEMS plan include having a strong commitment from management, getting an early start and utilizing a multi-disciplined team approach.For more information, please visit http://www.boemre.gov/semp/ or view the SEMS PowerPoint presentation here.

Sources
http://www.boemre.gov/semp/
http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFN0425169520110404
http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2010/10/06/3231